Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Timothy W. Johnson who wrote (84781)	11/22/2000 10:18:25 AM
From: Mr. Palau	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Hey, I didnt write the statute. I would be curious to know what, in addition to the dimpled chad, you would look at to determine "the clearly ascertainable intent of the voter of to vote." I can think of a couple of things. First, did the individual vote for any other candidate for that office? If not, that may be evidence that he intended to vote for his dimpled selection. Did he vote for every office other than that office? Again, mya be evidence that he also intended to vote for that office. Were all, or at least most, other of his other votes also by dimpled chads?