Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ex-INTCfan who wrote (18748)	11/22/2000 10:48:03 AM
From: Jim Willie CB	Respond to of 65232

CNN just showed Burton from WPalm before court on dimple discussion very thoughtful discussion covering many angles like if only dimple appears among prez choices, with full punches in secondary races, then NO CLEAR INTENT but if dimples appear in several places, include prez choice, then PROBABLY CLEAR INTENT an effort on Burton's part to be consistent with Broward he wants to do his best to earn public confidence on results I have concern over what they call a "pro se rule" on 1990 guidelines I interpret this to mean "we can interpret as we see fit" this Burton seems to be an honorable man, himself a judge intense scrutiny is to be expected from here on out these canvassing board officials are gonna need amphetamines where the hell is the effort to include disq'd military absentees? / Jim