Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam P. who wrote (61705)	11/22/2000 2:17:34 PM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 93625

Sam, Speaking of being clueless sometimes,what was he lying about if not a blowjob? Giving or receiving said activity is not a crime, and he was not impeached for that. As I've said before, I don't care who Clinton sleeps with as long as it's consensual. He was, however, accused of violating the civil rights of an individual through sexual harrassment and he lied under oath about his sexual activities in the "workplace". That is a very valid and common question to ask in these types of proceedings Incidentally, the Democrats were the party that pushed through these Civil Rights laws [and kudos for them to that]. It seems hypocritical to not believe in them, however, when one of your own people gets bitten in the butt by them. For example, I can still see Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein and several other women senators marching on the confirmation hearings of Clarence Thomas because he was accused of mentioning the words "pubic hair" to Anita Hill. However, I did not see them marching on the White House after Clinton was accused of sexual harrassment as well. Personally, I don't believe ethics should change depending on the party of the accused. Dave