Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pgerassi who wrote (118940)	11/22/2000 4:55:50 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

RE: "What was improper is the illegal rewriting of the rules after an election by ...the Florida Supreme Court. ...dimpled chad votes" Yesterday's Surpeme Court answered the question about allowing manual counts, not about dimpled chads, so your comment doesn't apply. In the briefings, at the top, is a section called the "Question" (which is what was before the SC). RE: "A very good law is the one where the election must be done to procedures" Yes, I definitely think following procudures should have happened - it is unfortunate the SOS decided to block routine election procedures by asking the boards to violate statute 106.221. Amy J