Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Windsock who wrote (119039)	11/22/2000 10:54:21 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 186894

Windsock, RE:"The voters did nothing illegal. But the Elections Supervisor that allowed alterations on the ballot applications and the R's that did the altering are looking at felony charges" As long as they didn't alter the vote I think they will be accepted...and should be. OTOH, the elections supervisor should have come clean a lot sooner and should be reprimanded... RE:"The strong anti-fraud Rules for absentee ballots were passed after after rampant fraud in a Miami election where all the absentee votes were tossed." I remember it well...dead people voted early and often and the election results were reversed...I think I posted an expose on it on another thread... I expect those absentee ballots in Seminole county should be screened for impropriety to make sure they are "clean". Other than that I don't want a partisan Judge ruling on it... Jim