Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSCO - where's the bottom?!?!? Bear Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom D who wrote (121)	11/24/2000 10:55:54 AM
From: BIG EYE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 253

If Bambs is so valuable (and I agree with you Tom), Tell SI (Bob) to stay out any scraps we have on this thread !!! Please everyone, send a message to SI. Ask SI to leave this thread (and posters) alone !!! BE

To: Tom D who wrote (121)	11/25/2000 8:38:46 AM
From: Monty Lenard	Respond to of 253

Tom D, what is just beautiful is the 2 reponses to that post of bambs. They can't even do a good job of lying when no one can look em in the eye. :-) Monty

To: Tom D who wrote (121)	11/27/2000 2:23:18 PM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 253

Tom D, In fact LU did break the quad top.. I sold at $70 when the chart started to weaken and made a nice gain. LU failed to meet earnings, fed raised rates multiple times and the environment changed. I would point out that none of the folks on this thread made any mention of those posts then. Hindsight is 20/20...what makes a good investor is when one knows when the environment has changed and to take action based upon on those changes. You can condemn me for taking a position if you like... but at least I have done so... more than I can say for a lot of people. The fact of the matter is that bambs has failed to provide the entire picture of those posts.... More pointedly.. anyone that tries to draw analogies between LU - who is self destructing internally and others in the sector simply misses the point of analyzing a market segment. OG