SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ThirdEye who wrote (7292)11/24/2000 12:21:42 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 10042
 
I believe that these are the only ballots that Miami-Dade wants to look at in the time allotted

Correction... what Miami-Dade WANTED.. They are mandated by law to recount all votes should they do a manual recount.

Which is why they voted yesterday to stop the recount. And which is why Gore is suing them to restart the recount...

Love watching Democrats sue Democrats... Show's the trend is decisively going in Bush's direction.

Btw, 100K out of 6 million votes may sound like a lot, but statistically it's a little over 1% of the total vote cast.

And the whole reason that "undervotes" should be eliminated is that there is simply no way to discern whether the voter deliberately chose NOT to vote for any presidential candidate, thus their lack of vote equating to abstaining.

They can't assume that because someone theoretically disliked both candidates and abstained, that it was some kind of error in one candidate's favor.

Regards,

Ron



To: ThirdEye who wrote (7292)11/24/2000 12:46:07 AM
From: Techplayer  Respond to of 10042
 
ThirdEye, Miami/dade does not want to look at those ballots since they feel it represents an inaccurate recount of the entire county. The 10750 undervotes will not be included at this point. There were between 19-27k of similarly discounted ballots in a northern republican county as well...

tp