Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joseph Pareti who wrote (119106)	11/24/2000 1:59:16 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Respond to of 186894

Joseph,<<<, if you make executables that are sympathetic to the Pentium 4's architecture, or if you use non-RDRAM memory that is both fast and low-latency, then the Pentium 4 system will knock the socks off its predecessors. >>> Just what is the controversy? If you were a software developer, why would you not write software consistent with the P4 architecture. Not only that, but chances are Intel marketing people went out and surveyed software developers to find out what they wanted and needed in a new architecture. IMO a lot of the chip techies on this thread should have been lawyers and PR spinners instead of chip techies. I could imagine a lot of investor types visiting this thread could really be confused and mislead by the P4 deficiency conspirators. Mary