Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Oracle Corporation (ORCL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WTSherman who wrote (14945)	11/24/2000 4:11:19 PM
From: lml	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19079

WT: I'll grant you that your opening remark could be taken either way, but under the totality of the circumstances, which include the OTHER insults you tossed my way in your other posts, one directly to me, and an indirect one to a third poster, I find your excuse less than believable. Notwithstanding, I think I've maintained proper demeanor in light of your own words calling me a moron. So, in sum, you are the one who needs to get a grip. you still have not answered WHAT the the compelling reason that corporate executives or IT people are going to accept that makes them feel its important to have both apps and DBMS engines from the same vendor. Again, you like to twist what has been said here. You have stated your opinion; I have stated mind. I need not provide a "compelling" reason for either case, because, each purchase decision will be decided on a case-by-case basis. For some reason you think I carry some burden of disproving your position as if you sit behind some bench. You don't. Where are the facts I ask you to provide to provide your position. I see none. Maybe it's too much turkey, I guess. Look, we're just two talking heads here; I need not disprove your position in a compelling way just as if you need not disprove mine. You just don't get it, do you? Get over yourself.