Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (40768)	11/24/2000 4:04:18 PM
From: pater tenebrarum	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

the thing is, the Supreme Court is not front-loaded with Democratic appointees. it may well come to the conclusion that the hand count is too much of a fraud invitation to be allowed to continue. after all, the only reason for it is that Bore lost. had he not, no-one would be clamoring for a re-count, which can only help the loser. putting it differently: IF machine counts are indeed inaccurate, the inaccuracies are in all likelihood distributed normally, i.e., they are not likely to favor one candidate over the other. hand counts are (obviously) different...