Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (86866)	11/24/2000 8:01:55 PM
From: Carolyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I think everyone on this thread should check back in 6 months, if only to look at ourselves.

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (86866)	11/24/2000 8:04:17 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Will Bush "win" his case before the Supreme Court? Depends on what you mean by "win". He could win on the issue of whether the Florida law is unconstitutional and lose when the Court says the remedy is to recount the vote for the entire state.

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (86866)	11/24/2000 9:42:19 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 769667

If we had campaign finance reform we wouldn't need politicians who are either very rich personally or kissing ass with every rich special interest to try and get elected. One reason some rich deocrats run is because the Dems just cannot keep up with the corporate soft money the GOP candidates get. Sure they get some too but have to rely on unions and Hollywood to try and catch up. Let's agree on passing the McCain-Feingold Bill and send letters to whomever your representatives are to do it. Otherwise we might even up with Jesse Ventura in the White House next with Nader as his running mate. As it stands, the rich and the corporate special interests continue to control the process. Absolutely.