SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (86877)11/24/2000 8:26:08 PM
From: Greta Mc  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Good question.

I think Gore, in that one circumstance, would then feel that it's not in the best interests of the country to continue the recounts.

Gore would then exalt the idea of no election being tabulated with 100% accuracy, at least in 2000....

but in 2004, gore and the machine may think we may need to look for 100% accuracy in certain (still to be determined) areas.



To: TideGlider who wrote (86877)11/24/2000 9:32:39 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Knowing full well that hand-counting only his counties would skew results in his favor, he had a chance to ask that all counties be counted in a fair manner. Too bad he didn't choose that option. Bush might have prevailed concerning the hand-counts themselves being innacurate(unlikely), but Gore at least, would be standing on higher ground.

Dan B


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News