Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : T.ITE: iTech Capital (TSE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ralfph who wrote (4864)	11/25/2000 1:43:56 AM
From: marcos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5053

Looks like when you said 'I am gone' he thought you were signing off on the stock, instead of just the post ... yeah i don't think tech is over either, but not sure it's having a nap, could be a coma -g- .... but on cash plus Enviromation [which i still think could end up being more important than anybody thought at the time] plus elas alone, and considering the price, i became a shareholder again ... in a really nominal insignificant way due to shortage of funds, but if it doesn't bounce hard i'll add some when possible ... management being methodically conservative worked against the thing in the great boom, but those are great survival traits in the busts ... and who knows, maybe they'll start the trend back to making holes in rocks on hillsides with strange-sounding names. I am gone now ... got to scrape my boots ... stepped in a layer of wisdom .. ;-)

To: ralfph who wrote (4864)	11/25/2000 1:35:46 PM
From: Davy Crockett	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 5053

<<Might take awhile but once things have shaken out we are due for a second wave>> down??? <<Will ITE be around for it ? That depends on how well they do getting money out of their first companies to go public and we all know how well that has worked to date.>> Please declare if you are long or short... comments like the above sure sound like you are short... if you are short good luck to you... I having nothing against shorts (indeed I wish I could go short... ) but again please declare your intentions.... If you are working from the short side I could engage you in some lively debates... As you noticed from my quick (off the cuff) reply to you... this is not STOCKHOUSE.COM... maybe I am pissed off because I spent $300.00 (US), & now I have to put up with posters like you who have nothing to add... IF I wanted to read posters like you I would read stockhouse.... you just contribute (so far from what I have read, to the overall NOISE) on these threads... In the future please comment intelligently or not all... (If you can't spell & (adding insult to injury) YOU know you can’t spell... use a spellchecker) Regards, Peter