To: PMS Witch who wrote (13403 ) 11/25/2000 12:57:02 PM From: mr.mark Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 110645 hi pw on the topic of memory, we all know that it is a complex subject, in which there appears to be disagreement among even the experts as to the benefit or lack thereof involved in adding more to your system. much has been written on the topic, and it really isn't my desire to delve into a scientific examination of the subject, nor would i be qualified to do so. but as you might have guessed, i do have a couple of little items i'd like to interject. <g3> re, "If you're referring to the resources measured by the resource meter, the little green 'beaker' in SysTray, adding more memory won't help" .... i am unfamiliar with this beaker, as i use norton 'windoctors' to keep tabs on such things as free resources. what i'd like to point out is that this number is often displayed as a percentage (i don't know if that's the case with the green beaker). so if a user with 128mb ram has, say, 50% free resources showing and endeavors to increase this number, he or she might add in another 128mb and anxiously turn the system back on to witness the metered improvement. in doing so, let's say the new reading also shows 50%. before the user becomes distraught over the whole concept, let's remember that what is really displaying after adding in the extra 128mb is 50% of a larger number. originally, the 50% represented 64mb free, but after the mem upgrade the 50% represents 128mb free."Windows 98, its ancestors and prodigy, have a built-in chunk of memory devoted to special uses which cannot be expanded. When this memory fills, that's it, and your system chokes" when i visit the dell upgrade site and plug in my system specs, i see that my dell dimension xps t500 that came with 128mb ram is expandable to 768mb ram. this brings up the question, can my system have too much memory? here i draw directly from the dell memory site: ************************************** "There is a point of diminishing returns where adding more memory may not enhance your system's performance. This point is determined by the "cacheable limit" of your system. Most Pentium systems have either 256K cache or 512K cache. With a 256K cache, upgrading beyond 64 MB is not usually beneficial. With a 512K cache, the limit moves up to 128 MB. With a Pentium II, the sky is the limit as the cache is integrated into the processor. Of course, these are guidelines applicable to general users. For specialized applications, more memory may be required." *************************************** now before i go any further, let me quickly interject for the sake of the skeptics out there (and believe me, i am often among your ranks!), that the very idea that a boxmaker in the business of also selling upgrade components might skew the facts a bit in order to make their case more valid, is not something that would shock me. but do i think that is the case here? i don't. dell continues.... "Here are some general guidelines we have developed that correspond with today's typical applications and the amount of memory recommended for each. Remember, the more you do, the more memory you may need". there's a somewhat informative chart found on this page to guide users towards their mem requirements.support.dell.com "However, adding 128 meg for $71 should give you the satisfaction of getting a really good deal" NOW YOU'RE TALKING!! <g3> basically, what i want to say is that i got the impression from your post that you were telling mag that adding mem would not improve his system performance. and i respectfully do not agree with that. :) mark