SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Pueblo who wrote (87411)11/25/2000 5:35:00 PM
From: puborectalis  Respond to of 769670
 
Somethings never change.........Defiant Milosevic re-elected party leader

November 25, 2000
Web posted at: 5:28 p.m. EST (2228
GMT)

BELGRADE, Yugoslavia -- Just weeks
after being ousted as president of
Yugoslavia a defiant Slobodan
Milosevic has been re-elected as leader
of the Socialist Party (SPS).

The vote came after a fiery speech in
which Milosevic claimed the country
was "in danger" and branded
Yugoslavia's new pro-democratic
leaders "traitors."

Milosevic, the only candidate for the
leadership, was re-elected with a vast
majority of the votes, a senior Socialist
official told reporters who were not allowed into the congress.

His re-election's means Milosevic will lead the Socialists in crucial parliamentary
elections next month in Yugoslavia's dominant Serbian republic.

Despite years of regional conflict, international isolation and embargoes crippling
the economy under his 13-year rule, Milosevic told delegates at the special
congress that the country had plunged into a deep crisis since the popular revolt.

But Milosevic's rare public appearance since the mass uprising on October 5,
which saw the ascent of Vojislav Kostunica, proved a stark contrast to the
party's February congress where thousands of supporters cheered his arrival.

On Saturday only about 100 party activists greeted Milosevic as he entered
Belgrade's Sava Centre, where some 2,300 party delegates were seated.

In his opening speech to the congress, Milosevic
described those who sought his removal as "paid
Western spies" who are aiding the "occupation" of
the country.

"The war which is being conducted against this
country is now being conducted with (Western)
money," Milosevic said.

He said that with the money, the West wants to
bribe the new leadership so they would allow the
breakup of Yugoslavia.

After a decade in power, the SPS has faced a
crisis since Milosevic's defeat with a number of
senior officials have left the one might party.

Two prominent members, Zoran Lilic and Milorad
Vucelic, have already founded their own political
groupings.

Milosevic's re-emergence after his downfall follows weeks of speculation that he
was considering retirement, becoming honorary party leader or transferring
executive powers to his deputy leaders.

Western governments have insisted there can be no political role for Milosevic,
blamed by the West for a major role in four Balkan wars over the past decade, in
a democratic Yugoslavia.

The Associated Press & Reuters contributed to this report.



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (87411)11/25/2000 5:39:33 PM
From: Jerry Miller  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
you're a hypocrite.
a phoney.
give you an award, and you think you run the place.

where does it say you can post parody, and Jay can't ?
what makes his post any more or less inflammatory than yours.

and who made you thread monitor ?
who gives a damn about your work in eliminating paid shrills?
poitical or otherwise ?

who cares what you think about how "on edge" any of us are ?
i mean, just who the hell are you, anyway ?



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (87411)11/25/2000 5:40:21 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
TLC,
Been checking the Florida sources...?
Apparently the major media haven't, either that or they are simply blatantly ignoring the truth....again!

Published Saturday, November 25, 2000, in the
Miami Herald

Pivotal move led to end of
Dade count

Protesters demanded better access

BY DON FINEFROCK
dfinefrock@herald.com

As Republican protesters
pounded on the locked doors
of the Miami-Dade Elections
Department Wednesday morning
demanding access to the
canvassing board, the members
of the board huddled inside
and made a critical decision.

Faced with an angry mob of
two dozen Republicans and
protests from reporters, the
board agreed to move back to
a public conference room on
the 18th floor at County Hall
where people could watch as
votes were tallied.

The decision seemed
incidental at the time, given
the scope of what the board
was trying to accomplish -- a
manual recount of 10,750
ballots that showed no vote
for president when scanned by
a counting machine.

As events unfolded, however,
the decision would prove
pivotal.

The board returned to the
18th floor three hours later
with a police escort and
promptly voted to abandon any
effort to recount ballots.

Elections Supervisor David
Leahy said the decision to
count votes on the 18th floor
had created an ``unworkable
situation. The board simply
could not complete the job by
the deadline set by the
Florida Supreme Court, he
said.

The board vote was unanimous:
The recount would stop.

Democrats now charge that the
board was intimidated by
Republican activists who
jeered the board and staged
noisy protests inside and
outside County Hall.

`NEAR RIOT'

``It was a near riot
situation, said Chad Clanton,
a spokesman for the
Gore-Lieberman Recount
Committee who was present on
Wednesday.

U.S. Reps. Carrie Meek,
D-Miami, and Peter Deutsch,
D-Pembroke Pines, asked the
Justice Department to
investigate ``what appears to
be a shocking case of
undermining the right to vote
through intimidation and
threats of violence.

They cited published reports,
including stories in The
Herald, that described the
rowdy protests that rocked
County Hall on Wednesday.

But Leahy -- one of three
members of the canvassing
board -- denied Friday that
the protests played any part
in his decision to scrub the
recount.

``The protest was not a
factor in my decision, he
said. ``We simply could not
get it done by the deadline.

Leahy denied a report in The
New York Times that quoted
him as saying the protests
had influenced his vote to
call off the recount.

He said the protest outside
his office had influenced the
board's decision to return to
the 18th floor, but not his
vote to scrap the recount.

``I was concerned that what
we were doing was not being
perceived as a fair and open
process, Leahy told reporters
on Wednesday.


The other two members of the
canvassing board -- County
Judges Lawrence D. King and
Myriam Lehr -- declined on
Friday to speak with The
Herald. Leahy declined to
speculate about their reasons
for voting to halt the
recount.

DOUR POUNDING

But Leahy and others who were
with the board on Wednesday
while it met inside the
Elections Department on the
19th floor at County Hall
said the board was aware of
the protest raging outside
the department.

Republican activists in Miami
to serve as official
observers during the recount
process chanted in the lobby
outside the department and
pounded on the locked doors,
demanding access.

The protest had the desired
effect. Mayco Villafana, the
county's communications
director, asked the board to
move back to the 18th floor.

Without taking a formal vote,
the board agreed.

The protest ``definitely
affected their decision, said
Los Angeles attorney Stephen
Kaufman, one of the
Democratic observers in the
room with the board. ``I
think they realized that it
was creating a perception
problem for them.

Kaufman said it was not clear
then that the recount was in
jeopardy.

But as the morning wore on,
Leahy said he became
convinced the board could not
meet the Sunday deadline for
completing the recount
because the decision to
return to the 18th floor had
created a logistical problem.

TOUGH DEADLINE

To meet the deadline, the
board would have to sort
through thousands of ballots
by hand and decide whether
those ballots had been
punched by a voter.

At the same time, it needed
to watch as those and other
ballots were run through the
counting machines on the 19th
floor -- first to segregate
some of the ballots with no
clear vote, and then again to
tally the results.

Leahy had hoped to proceed
with both jobs at once, but
the board's decision to
return to the 18th floor for
the hand count made that
impossible.

``It was clear we were not
going to make it, Leahy said.

The two judges agreed with
that assessment in public
remarks made Wednesday.

``It is not physically
possible to continue with
this task, Lehr said.

What other pressures weighed
on the two judges was not
known. Both must face county
voters to win reelection, or
move up to the circuit court.
Both judges were reelected this year to six-year
terms.

It is not clear whether the two judges were aware of
the protests being staged outside County Hall. But
board members were keenly aware of the pivotal role
they were playing in an intensely partisan political
drama.

``The Republic is watching us, King said at one
point Wednesday.

King's vote to stop counting may have been
influenced by his reading of Florida law. After the
canvassing board completed a partial recount of
three precincts on Nov. 14, attorneys for the
Democratic Party asked the board to recount only
those ballots that showed no vote for president.

First Assistant County Attorney Murray Greenberg
told the board it had the discretion to grant the
request, but King disagreed. The judge said he
didn't believe state law allowed the board to do
anything less than a full recount.

``The Legislature only gives us one way to do this
and that is a hand count of all the ballots, King
said.

INCONSISTENCY

When the canvassing board voted unanimously on
Wednesday morning to scrap the full recount and
tally only those ballots with no clear vote,
Republican attorney Miguel De Grandy was quick to
point out the inconsistency.

At one point, De Grandy read a transcript of the
judge's earlier remarks.

``I am well aware of what I said, King said.

Asked later if he thought state law allowed for less
than a full recount, King said he would defer to the
county attorney's office on that question.