Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George Acton who wrote (85907)	11/26/2000 6:41:27 AM
From: Freedom Fighter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

George, >The problem is that the Republican strongholds mostly used marked ballots or perhaps lever machines, which have a low error rate.<< I agree, but in a situation this close and where "every vote supposedly counts" I think you have to go all the way. "Lower" is not "None". Also, it's definitely not the case in the Cuban areas of the democrat districts that Miami decided not to count after Gore didn't pick much up in his best neighborhoods. :-) I see Gore winning unless there are aspects of the law that I don't understand that prevent the "partial" manual counts from being included. I know nothing about the law. Gore will find the votes among the pregnant chads, dimpled chads, possibly dimpled chads, chads that were intended to be dimpled, or elsewhere. :-) Wayne