Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (87822)	11/26/2000 5:17:32 AM
From: Scrapps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Agreed. Now a second thought. A recount is a recounting of the vote after it's been counted one time. To count again after that would not be a recount. It would be a recount of a recount OR a second recount, but it would really be a third counting of the vote. Should another count occur after that, then we have a third recount (4th count). When we consider this we must consider costs and benefits. I say the legislature's desire was not to recount recounts. This must be questionable and needs to be cleared up. Btw. I hear felt tipped pens to mark ballots worked in one county in Florida very well.