Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Windsock who wrote (119250)	11/26/2000 2:32:16 PM
From: deibutfeif	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Windsock, re:...felony violation of the Florida ant-fraud law... Right, in fact I agreed with you right up til you used the phrase "4700 fraudulent ballots". Even if there were irregularities, even illegalities, that resulted in the delivery of those ballots to their respective voters, the votes cast represented the freely expressed wishes of those voters. And while I am disgusted (though not "outraged" as Scumbria is - constantly) at what happened, I kind of wonder: is it so much worse than the various "get out the vote" efforts and "palm cards" used? If it was illegal, let those responsible be prosecuted. But there were no fraudulent ballots to be cast out, even if they weren't secret. And surely you would agree, not all those votes were for Bush anyway. ~dbf