Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Techplayer who wrote (43756)	11/26/2000 6:24:24 PM
From: Jim Lamb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77399

John Chambers interview here in Fortune mag.A short but good read. fortune.com

To: Techplayer who wrote (43756)	11/26/2000 6:38:42 PM
From: bambs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77399

You must be a Blodget fan. His picks did trade higher and made many a boat load of cash....Long Term buys they were not. Just like CSCO at this level. LU in the $50's. etc. Bambs

To: Techplayer who wrote (43756)	11/27/2000 10:03:11 AM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 77399

Thanks TP... Indeed I did make a good trade on LU. Bambs enjoy's bending the truth to suit his cause. I did however repurchase LU on an interday basis at 19 and change a few weeks back and exited when they laid another egg last week. That's a company that just wants to fail. I suspect Bambs will be proven wrong on NT as well. All in all however the real issue is that bambs spends his time telling everyone else what they did wrong but in the meantime takes no position himself.... even when asked he won't take a position. Fundamentally he is useless dredge on SI and hopefully SI Bob or Jeff will finally take care of the problem. In the meantime I'd ignore him ... he's not worth your time. OG