Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (19655)	11/26/2000 10:02:04 PM
From: Jim Willie CB	Respond to of 65232

dont worry about Dade County a recount will be rather balanced the original 1% sample was directed by Gore people they chose Democrat strongholds to produce best sample (translation: not a random sample) no Cuban districts were included in that sample Dade County is only 53% Democrat the Los Angeles Times reports that Dade County recount would not serve as a treasure trove for Gore dimples Gore tried to transform Americans' right to vote ... into Democrats' right to interpret dimpled votes and it almost worked very important distinction: handcount of machine ballots is necessarily subjective, unlike written ballots with checkmarks SCREW GORE AND THE LAME EDSEL HE RODE IN ON next up: newspapers across the country urging Gore to quit the fight / Jim