Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rande Is who wrote (42141)	11/27/2000 3:16:15 AM
From: jmiller099	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57584

With all due respect Rande, I wouldn't be so quick to pat yourself on the back. And I do mean that in respect; not in jest. I have read some of your posts and follow this thread when interesting posts are pointed out to me. Let me clarify: WAP doesn't compete with CDMA, different products. GPRS is behind schedule and slower than expected in real world scenarios. Nokia's announcement regarding the same was well hidden, for valid reasons. <namely: stubborn euros> <source: theregister.co.uk; Ouch, look at them numbers fly. Ick ick ick. TDMA has no 3G path except EDGE, which is proclaimed as dead. Also to debut in 2002. They have heat problems as well as no real world tests done. CDMA2000 is quite quicker to market and exists. WCDMA will be quicker to market. EDGE makes no sense... I think TDMA operators will need to transform their systems elsewhere in tandem with or advance of 3G rollouts. GSM is not 3G. Cheers to CDMA! bybye.