Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lml who wrote (2393)	11/27/2000 2:38:46 AM
From: Herschel Rubin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3887

To all DemoCrytes: Your slate of Presidential Candidates, Gore/Lieberman has just been renamed to "Sore/Loserman." Their actions throughout this debacle are exemplary of textbook "I am a victim" Democrytes in action. LML, thanks for your erudite posts heretofore. It's been great reading here (and will continue to be until this ugly Gore-induced event reaches closure). Ellen, keep up the posting here. I hope you never tire of demonstrating the need for logical debate in the face of the arrogance of ignorance (yes, I'm referring to you and your party, the Democrytes and their tired, worn-out arguments reeking of hypocrisy and bereft of principle). As you know, logic and reason will ultimately prevail and history will view this as a black mark on Gore's gravestone. And, BTW, Gore is history. Once the U.S. Supreme Court concurs with the Bush claims, and once the American public tires of Gore's abject lack of principles and his pit bull litigiousness, we'll see prominent Democrats start to distance themselves from Gore. What about loyalty? Where there are no consistent principles, there is no loyalty. Tune in and watch.

To: lml who wrote (2393)	11/27/2000 11:10:54 AM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3887

I suggest you chill a bit. If you can't back up your words here, then I suggest you refrain from making unsubstantiated allegations. Oh! I forgot, you're a Democrat. Unsubstantiated allegations that dimpled chads (as you brought up the subject and asked about it) haven't been counted elsewhere in this country? Where have you been for the past few weeks? You present yourself as an 'expert' of sorts on law. As such, you already know the answer to your own question. You are just trying to get back at me because I didn't appreciate your contacting me via pm (in attempts to lecture me on how I should post and what I should say) and put you on pm ignore status. And now you resort to insults. Great example you set there.