SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SBHX who wrote (8210)11/27/2000 1:43:15 PM
From: Bosco  Respond to of 30051
 
<ot>Hi SbH - in a nutshell, your logic

This shows <fill in the blank> wants to win more than he wants to unify the country.

[ed note: <...> is the poster's]

sounds very reasonable to me. But then, what else is new :)?

I mean, it is only natural for the apparent victor to "quit while ahead" and the apparent loser to "demand verification."

Unfortunately, IMHO, Trudeau and Clinton are probably the last larger than life leaders of the two respective countries. The real irony, IMHO, as far as the current US election is concerned, is that so much passion [from the general public] is invested in 2 people with so little passion. I mean, if people were gun-ho about McCain, I could understand it. So, my conclusion is that it is not so much about these candidates, but more tangible things like the future composition of the US Supreme Court etc etc.

I ve no answer to #3

best, Bosco



To: SBHX who wrote (8210)11/27/2000 1:57:42 PM
From: Zakrosian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
*OT* SbH - Another factor in Bush's not asking for a recount in those counties where he ran well ahead of Gore is that a majority of the rejected ballots came from precincts in which Gore did well. So even in his strongholds, he might have ended up losing more of his lead.

I don't know whether that was truly the case but I did read or hear that last week.