SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (90097)11/27/2000 1:22:15 PM
From: SecularBull  Respond to of 769667
 
Those are completely ridiculous assertions.

1) Gore did not request a full recount in the entire state, and if he was so interested in being fair, why did he not do so?

2) There could've been a statewide recount ordered by the Court. They already overstepped their bounds, why did they not just go a bit further?

LoF



To: American Spirit who wrote (90097)11/27/2000 1:35:28 PM
From: md1derful  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
bending rules therefore can benefit both sides and I think a statewide count would most accurately reflect Libermans...let all the votes count
doc



To: American Spirit who wrote (90097)11/27/2000 1:35:40 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
If Al Gore had truly sought fairness, i.e. requesting all applicable counties be hand-counted from the start instead of continuing to claim a count of votes in his chosen territory would give us a fair indication of who's the next President, I'm almost certain he'd have gotten it done.

Such a result flows naturally from adhering to principles of fairness, and are part and parcel of the reason why

Freedom Works,

Dan B


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News