SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: soozieque who wrote (129089)11/27/2000 3:55:37 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1583737
 
What gives here, folks?
Should we bail out or buy more?
AMD is acting like a leftover Thanksgiving-Day TURKEY.


soozieque,

This seems to represent a lot of the current thinking re AMD.

____________________________________________________________

AMD Needs Marketing Push to Combat New Intel Chip, Analysts Say


Sunnyvale, California, Nov. 27 (Bloomberg) -- Advanced Micro Devices Inc.'s speedy personal-computer chips beat Intel Corp. at its own game earlier this year. Now, analysts said the company has to win at Intel's other favorite sport: marketing.

Once a lagging rival to the No. 1 chipmaker, AMD overhauled its manufacturing and held the crown for the fastest chips for most of this year. With Intel's new Pentium 4 expected to keep the top spot for months, AMD may need a new way to sustain momentum.

Buyers have traditionally used a processor's speed to measure how well a PC performs tasks. Intel's image took a hit when AMD was the first to introduce an 850-megahertz device in February and then rolled out chips at 1 gigahertz and beyond. Now, with the Pentium 4 starting as fast as 1.5GHz, AMD needs a new sales pitch.

``AMD is going to have to convince consumers that clock speed isn't all that matters, and that's going to be a challenge,'' Insight 64 analyst Nathan Brookwood said.

Speed emerged as the primary benchmark when PCs ran a handful of basic applications like word-processing and data entry. As the Internet blossomed, that standard didn't change.

Still, it isn't the only way to judge a processor, and some analysts say it's no longer a good measure as the Web morphs into a three-dimensional arena for movie viewing and online auctions.

New Applications

By most accounts, Intel's Pentium 4, unveiled Monday, outdoes AMD's flagship Athlon in hefty applications like 3-D games and video editing. Intel executives promote the chip as built for ``where the Internet is going.''

Still, analysts said AMD's 1.2GHz Athlon bests Intel's new chip on basic programs consumers use every day.

``The die-hard gamer fanatic should like this machine (the Pentium 4),'' Brookwood said. ``For most other applications, AMD will continue to lead.''


Even so, Sunnyvale, California-based AMD must convince the undecided computer user that even though one chip is faster overall, it's not always better for every task. Recent ads in USA Today and the Wall Street Journal highlighted Athlon's design and new performance-boosting features.

That strategy will remain the same in the wake of Pentium 4, said Mark Bode, marketing manager for Athlon. A chip's design affects its performance by deciding how instructions are carried out, and AMD says its chips' so-called architecture is better.

``Users are becoming increasingly savvy,'' Bode said. ``They really look at what does this system deliver.''

Ubiquitous Competitor

It's a daunting challenge. Intel has built Pentium into one of America's best-known brands, and promotions featuring its hallmark chime jingle, bunny-suited workers and the trendy Blue Man Group have become part of popular culture.

Whatever the performance comparisons, some users just want a Pentium because it's so ubiquitous. That perception gives AMD the chance to compare results against products people already know and highlight the things it does better, said Zain Raj, president of ad agency FCBI Chicago.

Fighting for notoriety means finding the specific applications people need most and promoting AMD's wares, because the company can't just say it's got the fastest chips, he said.


``AMD talks about being better, faster than Intel -- it's a comparative thing, versus `You do this. I think AMD does that better.' There are a lot of people with very specific needs that AMD might do a better job at,'' Raj said.

AMD says ads only go so far. The chipmaker's newfound acceptance has come from improving its products and working with PC makers to help sell the systems to users, Bode said.

``Marketing is more than a glossy piece in a magazine or a TV ad,'' he said. ``We've got a great product now.''

What a Year

AMD doesn't have to dethrone Intel to win. Since Santa Clara, California-based Intel holds 80 percent of the market for PC processors, AMD can boost sales as long as it continues to gain share.

The company typically sells chips about 25 percent cheaper than similar models from Intel. If that pattern holds, steep price cuts may be looming. The 1.4GHz Pentium 4 sells for $644, while the top Athlon was unveiled last month at $612 -- just a 5 percent discount.

Still, AMD has time to plot its marketing strategy. Analysts said the Pentium 4 will be too expensive for all but the best of the high-end PCs this year and into early 2001.

``If you're running Web browsing, e-mail and Quicken, you'll be hard-pressed to rush out and buy it,'' Mercury Research analyst Mike Feibus said of the Pentium 4. ``When it falls into other price points later next year, it makes sense.''

Despite Intel's formidable strength, those expecting an easy ride for the company next year might want to think again. AMD floundered with product delays and manufacturing problems as Intel faced smooth waters in 1999.

This year, it's Intel that has been plagued by recalls and slower-than-expected sales. What a difference a year makes.


Nov/26/2000 17:30 ET

For more stories from Bloomberg News, click here.

(C) Copyright 2000 Bloomberg L.P.