Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (90517)	11/27/2000 5:34:34 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

>>>>he makes Nixon look like a saint.<< I think it's funny that when you name the biggest crook you can think of to compare President Clinton to that you use one of your own parties past presidents. Keep up the good work. By the way, Reagan or Daddy Bush would have worked almost as well.

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (90517)	11/27/2000 5:36:21 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

Nixon, yeah. So far, when I mention the well recognized fact that hand-counting only Gore's territory offers a geographical bias in his favor(94% agree), and point out that results to be determined by this method as Gore proposes would not be a fair count, and re-affirm that no states laws have EVER intended to allow candidates to engage in, let alone win by, attaining such advantages, I get only silence, or the false claim that Fla. law did in fact intend to allow for candidates to "cherry-pick" counties and geographical advantages. The US Supreme court would not affirm such a scheme. The 10,000 some ballots being spoken of are only a PART of such ballots "never counted." Counting them would NOT represent a full fair count! Sorry, I'm speaking to the choir here, Dan B