Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (19878)	11/27/2000 8:22:26 PM
From: Mannie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

Some great shots: antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (19878)	11/28/2000 8:57:09 AM
From: im a survivor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

<<how does he conduct discovery of 450,000 ballots?>> To be fair and true : In all prior elections, over/undervotes were thrown into the trash. If intent was not clear, the votes did not count. Now in this election they decide to count and recount those ballots AND try to determine the intent of a voter, when in fact, they cannot be 100% sure what that persons intent was. Additionally, they ONLY want to do this in several, highly democratic area's. To be fair, every over/under ballot in the US would need to be counted, if they count ONE in florida. I mean talk about disenfranchising the voter...sheez. Why do over/undervotes get counted ONLY in several democratic parties, and not all over!! Why is somebody changing my vote or trying to determine what my intent was?? Simply amazing. Keith