SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SecularBull who wrote (90931)11/27/2000 9:27:31 PM
From: KM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Speaking of that, has anyone seen this picture? LOL!!! Can you imagine one in worse taste? It's like "come and get it!"

ROFLMAO!!

esquire.com



To: SecularBull who wrote (90931)11/27/2000 9:37:50 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Politicians lie all the time. But what did Whitewater have to do with Clinton's sex life? (nothing) Whitewater was a real joke and total waste of money. Just think how many months of time it cost our representatives. Thank God some of them like McCollum were punished for their escapades. we don't need A-holes like that in congress. Voters agreed. And Ken Starr will go down in history as a big waste of time and money. He proved and achieved nothing. Trying to make mountains out of mole-hills. All he came up with was a BJ in the Oval Office. Red meat to the sharks. Clinton now enjoys a 65% approval rating despite that BS.



To: SecularBull who wrote (90931)11/27/2000 9:38:58 PM
From: Thehammer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
<<It should be when he lied in a civil sexual harrassment suit that could have caused the plaintiff to lose her suit (until he was caught in the lie).>>

In my opinion,(arrived at after consultation with corporate counsel), what Clinton did in the White House could be construed to be sexual harassment. It wasn't the fact that it was consentual, but the fact that Clinton had Vernon Jordan running around trying to find a job for Monica,
As I understand it, this constitutes a hostile work environment in that ANY person who did not have sex with Clinton and was not afforded the same opportunities at job placement such as Monica, could have grounds to sue. Granted this is the federal government and not a corporation.