Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (129132)	11/27/2000 11:19:20 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570678

I don't know what the gain was at the time of my posting to you but clearly it was more than 1484. In fact the Secretary of State has certified a gain of 2841 for Gore.....as I understand it, most of those were gained during the first recount and do not include any of the Gore votes in Miami/Dade nor PB Counties that were gained during the hand recounts. This page has all the disputed info: foxnews.com It has the recount numbers that resulted with Bush lead by 300 votes. If you go back, add Gore's gains subtract Bush's gains you end up with Bush's lead of 1784. Another source of info, CNN site shows Nov 7 count as Bush lead of 1725 (a slight discrepancy): cnn.com I don't know where your info is from, but since the number supporting some major conspiracy theory of yours is flawed, would it be a stretch to assume that the conspiracy theory based on a flawed number is flawed as well? I USED FOX.COM...MY ORIGINAL POINT IS THAT MOST OF THE STATE'S COUNTIES CONTRIBUTED TO GORE'S 2000+ GAIN IN THE RECOUNT AND NOT JUST PB OR BROWARD COUNTIES....88% OF THE COUNTIES. AND ACCORDING TO FOX.COM, THE TOTAL GAIN WAS 2000+ AND NOT THE NUMBER THAT YOU HAVE BANDIED ABOUT....I THINK PETZ IS RIGHT...YOU ARE TALKING NET WHILE I AM TALKING THE ENTIRE GAIN FOR GORE. MY SO-CALLED CONSPIRACY THEORY IS IS THAT THE INITIAL VOTE COUNT WAS TAINTED AS EVIDENCED BY THE EXTENSIVE MISCOUNTING THROUGHOUT THE STATE. DEAL WITH IT!! Yes, but like I instructed you in my last post (see excerpt from above), when you get to that Bush website, go down to near the bottom of the page....there you will find the article in question and the referral to US News and World Report. I did. All I found was an article of unknown origin on an anti-Bush site. To give it more legitimacy, there is a link to the home page of US News & World Report. I can write an article, add a logo + a link of US News & World Report and post in the web. OH MY GOD......YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY AMAZING. YES, JOE, I THINK SCUMBRIA IS VERY GOOD AT WEBSITE DESIGN AND FAKED THE WHOLE THING. YOU CAUGHT ME....I TRIED TO GET ONE PAST YOU BUT YOU CALLED ME ON IT. I AM SO BUSTED. TED