Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (38300)	11/28/2000 8:18:59 AM
From: Victor Lazlo	Respond to of 64865

A couple mos back on one of the news programs, I believe it was CBS Sunday Morning, there was a segment on environmental issues, Gore/Bush. One of the topics was whether TX envir was really as bad as the Dems were portraying it. Conclusion was that it was not- So Calif had always been the worst for air qual with so TX always running second. But as So Calif's auto emissions improved and for economic reasons the amount of manufacturing in the LA area decreased, TX rose in the dubious ranking, even though they had not really gotten worse- South Calif had simply gotten much better. Talked about the successes and failures Bush has had with using the carrot approach instead of the stick approach with bus and industry in envir compliance. Bottom line was mixed reviews of Bush record but not nearly as bad as the Gore campaign tried to demonize him with. Now, why do you assert that TX got worse under Bush? Victor