SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Quinn who wrote (14076)11/28/2000 11:41:10 AM
From: Phil Jones  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14627
 
100% agreement on that, Quinn. I've been thinking along the same lines. Even those who got in at 60c are losers at the current price. You'd think that CMS would make some announcement about Diablillos or possible new sites that the firm might be involved with -- or even give out a weather report -- just to show that PFG's management is still functioning and sees some future for the company. Maybe she's still in shock -- like most of the rest of us. I still find it very hard to understand how so much could be above the ground, and so little below. Not being a geologist, I'm assuming that what happened at Luicho is understandable to geologists. As a layperson, I can't see why the gold on the surface doesn't bear some relation to what's under it! Phil



To: Quinn who wrote (14076)11/28/2000 4:22:02 PM
From: Bill Jackson  Respond to of 14627
 
Quinn, CMS is probably trying to find a new deal for the co. the burn rate has to be a lot lower. Dog and pony shows are stopped and there is no drilling etc.

Buy now

Bill



To: Quinn who wrote (14076)11/29/2000 1:11:19 AM
From: charred  Respond to of 14627
 
The burn rate is approx. 30 g's per month just on salaries. She has nothing going and if she did why believe her?