Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: $Mogul who wrote (92449)	11/28/2000 5:18:35 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 769670

So much for Al Gore's "rule of law" to prevail....now he's dissing the US SC! How low can this guy go? Bush, Gore Plea to Supreme Court By John Solomon Associated Press Writer Tuesday, Nov. 28, 2000; 4:41 p.m. EST WASHINGTON –– In an extraordinary plea, George W. Bush's lawyers on Tuesday asked the nation's nine justices to bring "legal finality" to the presidential election by overturning the Florida courts and ending any further recounts. Al Gore's team countered that the U.S. Supreme Court should not interfere in Florida's presidential recount dispute. The matter "does not belong in federal court," the vice president's lawyers argued. Three days before the nation's highest court hears arguments, both sides filed final written arguments. Bush asked the justices to overturn a Florida Supreme Court ruling that allowed hand recounting of votes to continue past a state imposed deadline Nov. 14, saying the manual reviews opened the door for Gore to continue legal contests for weeks more. "The Florida Supreme Court's decision, which conflicts with both federal statutes and the federal Constitution, will thus continue to affect, and has the theoretical potential to change, the outcome of the presidential election in Florida, and thus the nation," the Bush lawyers argued. Bush's lawyers noted that Gore is now contesting the election, even after the extended deadline set by the Florida Supreme Court, and seeking additional hand counting of thousands of disputed ballots. The Republican's attorneys told the justices that reversing the Florida court ruling was neded to bring an end to the election dispute. "Reversal by this Court would restore the legislatively crafted method for appointing electors in Florida to its status prior to November 7, would allow the completion of the proper selection of presidential electors in Florida according to the plan contemplated by the Constitution, and would aid in bringing legal finality to this election." The Bush attorneys also argued that the Florida high court violated the Constitution by extending a "clear" vote recount deadline set in law by the state Legislature to ensure proper election of the state's 25 electors to the Electoral College. The Constitution, the Bush brief said, gave that power solely to the Legislature, and the court improperly vacated the deadline when it allowed hand recounts to continue in three Democratic-leaning counties for 12 days beyond a state deadline of Nov. 14. "The Florida Supreme Court thus consciously and boldly overrode Florida's 'laws enacted prior to' election day and replaced them two weeks later with laws of its own invention," the brief said. Gore's lawyers dismissed those arguments as "insubstantial" and said the Florida court had "played a familiar and quintessentially judicial role" in interpreting state law. They asked the justices to affirm the ruling and avoid trampling on what is supposed to be a matter of state law. "Principles of federalism counsel strongly against interference by this court," the Gore legal team said in its brief. © Copyright 2000 The Associated Press

To: $Mogul who wrote (92449)	11/28/2000 5:24:27 PM
From: BishopsChild	Respond to of 769670

Has there been anyone running for office that wanted a recount when they were ahead.....????