Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SecularBull who wrote (92546)	11/28/2000 5:36:30 PM
From: lawdog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

The GOP didn't think so. They filled the info out, illegally. But for the GOP's malfeasance those votes would not have been cast. That is a fact.

To: SecularBull who wrote (92546)	11/28/2000 5:36:32 PM
From: Whiteboy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

That court case might have some basis if it were the actual ballots but with it just being the request for a ballot..No dice....Next lawsuit please Whiteboy

To: SecularBull who wrote (92546)	11/28/2000 6:07:16 PM
From: lawdog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

LoF, the other problem is that the GOP affiliated elections supervisor didn't grant the same access to Democrats. So, even if you were to allow the poison fruit to count, how can you justify the election supervisors actions that prevented hundred and possibly thousands of Gore supporters from voting. 1. You can't allow a perpetrator of a crime to benefit from his/her malfeasance. This is standard American Jurisprudence. 2. It is patently unfair to Democrats and Independent voters to only allow the GOP to amend (illegally) absentee ballot requests. 3. 2 makes whether or not they were valid votes on their face irrelevant because Democratic voters were not afforded the same. It is unfair to 50 million+ voters who cast their votes for Gore to allow those GOP votes to count. Read this: campaignwatch.org