SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MeDroogies who wrote (87157)11/28/2000 6:03:22 PM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Respond to of 97611
 
Droog, me mate:

>I think Transmeta's product is pretty good. There is some value in what they are doing, battery life aside. It makes alot more sense to have code do what hardware is currently doing on Intel chips. I know Intel has chips similar to Transmeta's, but not as good as (from what I've heard from impartial sources). I think the speed issue is moot, because past about 300k (my current computer at work), you're not talking about HUGE differentials. What is interesting is the heat issue. I hate the heat my work laptop generates, and loved using the Transmeta one...much cooler.<

Don't get me wrong, this is not about a technical analysis of the TM chip. It is about investment risk.

It is about using federally insured deposits to reallocate capital to the detriment of the economy.

But there is a difference between saying the technology of TM is interesting versus popping 400 Million dollars as a bet. What I am saying is there is NO CHANCE IN HELL that a bank would make a 400 Million loan to an "insolvent" borrower without the inside information that another branch of the bank was going to pay off that same loan with what may loosely be called otherwise federally insured depositors' funds.



To: MeDroogies who wrote (87157)11/28/2000 6:08:24 PM
From: Elwood P. Dowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
I lifted the following at The Zoo. I don't know if it is old or new and/or if it has been posted here before. As a matter of fact, the only thing that I do know for sure is that I'm going to have another cold beer. El

NEWS: Compaq rules in
servers
by: dsl_rocks
11/28/00 5:32 pm
Msg: 198685 of 198692

Dell takes lead in workstations;
Compaq pulls away in servers
SAN JOSE--The third-quarter picture for the high-performance end of
the global PC market looked solid, but servers clearly outpaced
workstations, according to preliminary data from Dataquest.

Server sales jumped 16.5% to more than 1 million units in the third
quarter, while workstations grew by only 3.9% to 381,835 units, the
market researcher estimates.

The top three server vendors accounted for more than 58% of the
global market in the third quarter, with Compaq Computer extending
its lead, gaining a 27% market share. Dell grew 41% in the quarter,
moving closer to IBM in the No. 2 position. "Dell benefited from an
aggressive marketing strategy on operating systems and
advantageous price/performance ratios on lower-end systems," says
Jeffrey Hewitt, Dataquest analyst.

Shortages of memory chips slowed shipments for many vendors in
the second quarter, but there were no such component challenges
reported for the third quarter, he says. Dell and Sun Microsystems
were the only top-tier workstation vendors to have growth rates
above the industry average, Hewitt notes.

"Some vendors experienced minor shortages in graphics cards in
the third quarter," says analyst Pia Rieppo, But "overall, the industry
is right on track for Dataquest's [earlier] forecast 8%-to-9% annual
growth rate."

siliconstrategies.com



To: MeDroogies who wrote (87157)11/28/2000 8:45:44 PM
From: rudedog  Respond to of 97611
 
MeD - re: I know Intel has chips similar to Transmeta's, but not as good as (from what I've heard from impartial sources).
Intel's low power chip uses less power and generates less heat than Transmeta's design. It is also about twice as fast. So in practical terms - i.e. from the user's point of view - it is better. Transmeta's ideas are interesting because of the concept of executing a variety of different code streams, but code emulators always pay a penalty against native execution. I would say that Transmeta has maybe one more chance to get it right or they will be an interesting technical footnote in computer history.