Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: $Mogul who wrote (93155)	11/28/2000 11:00:08 PM
From: SecularBull	Respond to of 769670

I understand the case quite clearly. The problem is that you are relying solely on day-old news to get your panties all in a knot. The fact is that the Democrats sent out applications with the numbers on them to their supporters. What's different between that and the Republicans putting the numbers on them? You act as if the Republicans forged ballots. The case, Roe v. Alabama is not precedent, because it dealt with ballots without witness signatures. We are talking about applications for ballots; not ballots. The voters had every expectation that their votes would be valid. The votes belong to the voters, and the voters filed legal absentee ballots. The voters did not commit fraud. Lastly, there is no practical remedy. The dumbass trial lawyer wants all absentee ballots (15,000) thrown-out. I have a life size picture of that happening. This case is dying, because it never had merit. LoF