Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (61994)	11/29/2000 1:23:25 AM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Jim, Soft landing is still a possibility. After Gore concedes. You are truly delusional. Scumbria

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (61994)	11/29/2000 8:30:33 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 93625

<<RE:"Are you still bragging about AG's soft landing? Should I dig up some of your posts from the spring?" Soft landing is still a possibility. After Gore concedes. Unless Gore takes us to the point of no quick return. Jim>> Jim it is total nonsense to think the election had anything to do with where the markets are headed. Did this election B.S. spped up the process, yes it did. Look at some companies out there. BRCD a PE of 510, is this justified. PMCS in spite of falling 60% has a PE of 210 and a growth of 60% (if you believe that growth will really happen). The plain fact of the matter is, that in spite of how far stocks have fallen, there is still much more to give up. Gore vs Bush is irrelevant. The economy will do what the economy will do, aided of course by Greenspan, who I believe is still targeting the "wealth effect" of stocks as inflationary. Comments, Zeev or anyone.

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (61994)	12/1/2000 11:10:57 PM
From: Dan3	Respond to of 93625

Re: Soft landing is still a possibility. After Gore concedes. Since Gore won the popular vote and would have 8,000 more votes in Florida if not for the "fixed" ballot apps and Buchanan being the second punch spot while being the third name on the ballot, wouldn't you say the only decent thing for Bush to do is to concede. For the sake of the country? I mean, he knows darn well that more legally registered voters went to the polls to vote for Gore than for him. Why is Bush putting us all through this when he knows a few more people wanted Gore than him? Doesn't Bush care about what he's doing to the stock market? :-) Dan