Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonkie who wrote (93424)	11/29/2000 1:40:56 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Direct me to the law that covers this particular thing, I have not seen a statute clearly invoked in any article.....

To: zonkie who wrote (93424)	11/29/2000 2:30:57 AM
From: Gordon A. Langston	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

I would have a clerk sample about 500 republican ballots and see what percentage of them voted for Wimp Jr. Say for instance 90% of the republicans voted for Wimp Jr the I would deduct 10% from the 4,700 ballots that were illegally tampered with and cancel the rest. You can't be any more fair than that , can you? Wow, here in California Republicans and Democrats got the same ballots. This is quite a revelation that Republicans received different ballots from Democrats or I suppose Reform Party voters. Maybe there is a "secret" way to divine a Republican ballot (perhaps a penumbra or an emanation?). Florida is more screwed up than I thought. Get it straight. Ballots were not tampered with and there are only accusations that adding voter ID #'s to defective requests for absentee ballots constituted a crime.