SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (9380)11/29/2000 3:30:54 PM
From: MikeM54321  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
"Whatver remains of ADSL after CLECS bite the dust is not relevant."

elmatador- Excellent analysis of the overall CLEC vs ILEC battle. And I would have to agree it appears to be playing out like you painted.

Next, how do you see the cableco vs the ILECs high-speed data battle. Can you paint a picture of what you see happening in this battle? Thanks. -MikeM(From Florida)



To: elmatador who wrote (9380)11/29/2000 7:09:28 PM
From: Mark S.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
elmatador

your view on the CLEC's makes sense. So you don't believe DSL is dead, only the CLEC's are in the drink. VZ's news was a surprise but not unexpected. COVD is probably next. The burn rate with their own admission is mid 2002.

I have particular interest in CMTN. My view is regardless of there advances, the ILEC's won't buy from CMTN because of their affiliation with the CLEC's. I know this is a broad statement, but LU quit buying from CMTN even though their product is considered OK. Telecom is tough business. GM Management style is alive and well with the big players.