SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (119634)11/29/2000 7:14:39 PM
From: Windsock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Elmer - Re: "First off this isn't going anywhere because it's over and Bush won, but just as a curiosity I would like to know how they would know which votes to throw out?"

You have identified a key point: there is no way to identify the 4700 fraudulent ballots. The D that went to Court is therefore asking that all 15 K absentee ballots be discarded. I don't think that this will ever happen. But it is very possible that those involved will see some jail time.

But there is precedent for discarding all the absentee ballots. This was done in the 1996 election for mayor of Miami, that produced the antfraud protections, and it changed the result of the election. The winner was the current Cuban-American mayor, don't remember his name, who you saw on TV all the time in the Elian fracas



To: Elmer who wrote (119634)11/29/2000 7:34:39 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Elmer,

First off this isn't going anywhere because it's over and Bush won

I have seen very similar comments on the Rambus thread from Rambus zealots, with respect to their imaginary battle between RDRAM and DDR.

Scumbria


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News