Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Green who wrote (62057)	11/29/2000 8:49:40 PM
From: mishedlo	Respond to of 93625

Don, I am talking long term not short term. I did exaggerate when I said "no affect", but far less than exaggeration than Richard and Jim who think Gore is 100% to blame. Furthermore, I am not saying that Gore VS Bush does not have an affect, I am saying the UNCERTAINTY surrounding this event is not as much to blame as evaluation scares, earning scares, fears of recession, etc etc etc. I believe the markets will rally after Bush steals the thing, but that this rally will be short lived, and until earnings come in line with slowing growth, a recession, and the deficit, along with whatever nonsense Greenspan does, that this "Gore" affect is indeed minimal. For the sake of argument, 15-20% of the market problem is the election uncertainty. Once either of them is elected, the markets will proceed on course with what they were going to do. Does this make any sense? If not I would like to hear your view. Thanks.