Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (94854)	11/29/2000 9:05:37 PM
From: md1derful	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769669

Party...your treatise is well stated....so fine the buggers few hundred dollars and throw 'em in jail....lets count the fricken votes for godsakes doc

To: PartyTime who wrote (94854)	11/29/2000 9:20:10 PM
From: zonkie	Respond to of 769669

I agree with you about the absentee mess being something that the republican party would be railing over if the roles were reversed. It is so much worse than some of the things they thought was so important when they were saying all laws must be observed that it is hard to compare them. But what will the judge rule? For example they would be showing us things like the following. _____ >>The portion of section 20 which has not been precleared provides that an absentee ballot is "illegal" if the voter does not include the last four digits of his or her social security number and comply with the witness requirements. The portion of section 20 which creates the supervisor’s notice requirement with respect to ballots rejected by the canvassing board because of signature discrepancies was precleared. << The above does not necessarily mean that that is what I am saying is the present law, it was taken from the following page which contains a lot of stuff which is law and stuff which has been objected to by the Justice department. dos.state.fl.us