SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (20869)11/29/2000 8:55:19 PM
From: Dealer  Respond to of 65232
 
From Comstock Partners

Premature To Discount Fed Easing Now
Today’s weak market action was significant since investors took further signs of a slowing economy as a negative indicator rather than a positive omen that would lead to a Fed easing of monetary policy. Consumer confidence in November fell to 133.5, the lowest reading in 13 months.
Moreover, while the October decline was taken in stride since the index had declined in every October for the past 11 years, it had, until now,rebounded in every November since 1992. In addition durable goods orders plunged by 5.5% in October, although ex aircraft and defense, the
decline was only 0.5%. This follows yesterday’s release showing a drop in existing housing sales for October. The only sign of strength was in holiday retail sales, but the significance was undercut by unusually early price discounts and special promotions. If more economic weakness becomes evident soon, there is a strong possibility that the Fed would drop its tightening bias as a prelude to eventual ease. However, as today’s market action indicates, such a move by the Fed may not be greeted that warmly, as investors would then be reacting in a very negative way to a possible hard landing, declining earnings and potential
credit problems. This would hardly be an unusual reaction as, historically, it has generally required two or more easing moves (sometimes many more) to get the economy and market moving upward following a severe bear market. As economists Ed Hyman and Nancy Lazar recently reminded us, the S&P 500 dived 27% AFTER the Fed started to ease in 1974, and by 16% AFTER the Fed started to ease in 1981. The
point is that the economic and financial conditions that eventually convince the Fed to ease are usually so
severe that investors are busy reducing equity holdings at the time of the first easing. Since we are not yet at that point, we think it would be a mistake to get overly optimistic now about a future Fed easing.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (20869)11/29/2000 8:57:36 PM
From: Dealer  Respond to of 65232
 
From Comstock Partners

Premature To Discount Fed Easing Now
Today’s weak market action was significant since investors took further signs of a slowing economy as a negative indicator rather than a positive omen that would lead to a Fed easing of monetary policy. Consumer confidence in November fell to 133.5, the lowest reading in 13 months.
Moreover, while the October decline was taken in stride since the index had declined in every October for the past 11 years, it had, until now,rebounded in every November since 1992. In addition durable goods orders plunged by 5.5% in October, although ex aircraft and defense, the
decline was only 0.5%. This follows yesterday’s release showing a drop in existing housing sales for October. The only sign of strength was in holiday retail sales, but the significance was undercut by unusually early price discounts and special promotions. If more economic weakness becomes evident soon, there is a strong possibility that the Fed would drop its tightening bias as a prelude to eventual ease. However, as today’s market action indicates, such a move by the Fed may not be greeted that warmly, as investors would then be reacting in a very negative way to a possible hard landing, declining earnings and potential credit problems. This would hardly be an unusual reaction as, historically, it has generally required two or more easing moves (sometimes many more) to get the economy and market moving upward following a severe bear market. As economists Ed Hyman and Nancy Lazar recently reminded us, the S&P 500 dived 27% AFTER the Fed started to ease in 1974, and by 16% AFTER the Fed started to ease in 1981. The
point is that the economic and financial conditions that eventually convince the Fed to ease are usually so
severe that investors are busy reducing equity holdings at the time of the first easing. Since we are not yet at that point, we think it would be a mistake to get overly optimistic now about a future Fed easing.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (20869)11/29/2000 9:11:22 PM
From: No Mo Mo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Jim-

"Keep an eye on the US dollar. If the US dollar starts to fall, Uncle Al and the Feds will have their hands tied and will be unable to sustain a longer term trend of lowering interest rates."

This is pretty much the next stage of the scenario the bears over on the Clown Free Zone have been describing for months/years. First tech crashes, then the wider equity market, then the Dow, then the dollar. That's why they're so heavily into metals as a last refuge.

They've been right (finally) since April. Given the possible severity of the pendulum from the March highs, do you think the dollar crash scenario is likely? If so, do you have any hedge plan?

-Darin



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (20869)11/29/2000 10:04:10 PM
From: surfbaron  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Jackass: I'm confoosed. Green Eggs & Ham can not directly affect long rates (30yr), which currently are yielding less than short rates. What can we infer from that? especially since most firms borrow at the short end..