SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Pueblo who wrote (94915)11/29/2000 9:40:07 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
The best I saw was a former US SC clerk that was on earlier tonight. He said that the flaw (and weakness) of the Florida SC ruling was that it was results-based. He said that it appeared that the justices determined the desired result, and then worked the framework of their decision to accommodate it. That's the pure example of writing law from the bench (a violation of the separation of powers).

He said that the Bush case is solid, but that anything could happen. He seemed to think that they might not rule on it (like the 11th Circuit chose not to rule), given the fact that the result of the election has not been changed (yet). Yet he was most certain that the court will set some precedent, otherwise they would not have heard it.

LoF



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (94915)11/29/2000 9:48:43 PM
From: dvdw©  Respond to of 769667
 
TLC, Now that is an astute observation. The whole thing about liberal establishment is to get judges to make laws, so lawyers and their appointed can further claim their status as the new entreprenuers. cept they dont understand, the kind of wealth their creating through redistribution leads only to bankruptcy.