SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Green who wrote (63366)11/29/2000 9:57:09 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 99985
 
If one believes that real tech buildout is still intact (which I do, even though I do not agree with the valuations), then at current levels, LU would seem to be a better bet, gamble, punt than CSCO, SUNW or EMC, to be sold promptly upon inkling of profit, as there will be another chance to buy again.

Between SUNW and EMC, I prefer EMC. Storage requirement, even for SI, is going up, though I do not know if SI makes enough money to pay for more EMC/NTAPs. The storage players should be lobbying for laws requiring 10 year storage of all postings ... and later, all memory hogging video footages. These are at least repeatable stories by the stock salesmen during the bounce.



To: Don Green who wrote (63366)11/29/2000 9:58:06 PM
From: Stephen M. DeMoss  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
OT> Cien, Scmr, Brcm, Jdsu, Glw, Sunw, EMC, Xlnx, bvsn, qcom (after it breaks down also <G>). Some second tier like Atml, Klic, and even GTW (if it falls to 15 area like appl did). Of Course CSCO if it breaks support and probably INTC. Every several years the market gives you an opportunity like this. I think your wise looking over the carnage and going long...soon! Steve D.