Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Techplayer who wrote (43902)	11/29/2000 10:42:49 PM
From: zbyslaw owczarczyk	Respond to of 77400

· Difference between Nasdaq 100 futures and fair value -135.53, Nasdaq 100 (globex)2475.00: -55 for December TP i think he is talking about difference between futures and fair value. here is the link: cnnfn.cnn.com i am not sure with number we should look at any idea Zbyslaw

To: Techplayer who wrote (43902)	11/29/2000 10:44:56 PM
From: DGG	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 77400

Ease up everyone...futures trade electronically 24 hours (although with virtually no liquidity in overnight sessions) and there are no limits - up or down - outside of pit trading during the North American session. All the information being posted about how far down the futures are INDICATING seems correct based on all of the different sites showing information this evening. And, yes, when the futures pit opens in the morning if people are still as beared up, the futures will open limit down and stay locked until they meet the requirements for being released from that condition. So everybody is right - what a great thing.

To: Techplayer who wrote (43902)	11/30/2000 8:32:15 AM
From: bambs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

you are completely wrong...time to phone a friend with market knowledge and have them explain why we are currently trading down 140 or so from 4 pm. you will see when the nasdaq opens. we gap down big time and unless we get a huge bounce off jobless claims. 120+ You always sound so sure when you really have no idea, even about the most simple of subjects. there is no fault in being positive, but limiting to being confident is the trick. Eat your rude insulting words....perhaps it's time you study the market you trade in and save yourself some money. bambs

To: Techplayer who wrote (43902)	11/30/2000 10:21:20 AM
From: bambs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

bambs, your numbers can't be right since the limit up or down is 2.5% of the average or 95 I believe. Even when INTC pulled the warning a while back, the locked down limit was 95 despite a 150+ point negative. The futures as seen on CNBC earlier were -55. Bloomberg TV likely has a real updated number. You always sound so sure when you really have no idea, even about the most simple of subjects. there is no fault in being positive, but limiting to being confident is the trick. tp you are wrong...i was right... I was right that csco was a better short then a long at $70...i called for $45 this year and said it has a chance to hit $35... I also said 1500 next year on nasdaq and csco will hit $35 for sure....$25 is a good bet. I'm pretty close so far. the year ain't over yet... it's hard to tell how long dumb money will pour in to bloated pig stocks like csco...how dumb is the average investor? bambs