Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TraderGreg who wrote (3984)	11/29/2000 11:53:30 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6710

I am listening to him right now, and what I heard him say was that the United States Supreme Court would probably review the appointment of Electors by the Florida Supreme Court. My thought is that the United States Supreme Court would review it to give it their blessing and reassure people that it is OK, for all the good it will do. I should mention that as a member of the Fairfax Bar Association I have been privileged to hear Justice Scalia address our organization on Law Day on the topic of judicial restraint - similarly, as a member of the Federalist Society, I have heard addresses by learned scholars including the unjustly maligned Robert Bork. So I may be justly described as biased - but I think I am right about how the United States Supreme Court would rule if the issue was presented to them. This is one of those fascinating issues that perhaps only a lawyer can love. God! This is so much fun! The sea change that has occurred since the debacle involving the appointment of Judge Bork to the United States Supreme Court seems to have occurred under the radar screen of the mass media.