Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (502)	11/30/2000 12:34:42 AM
From: CatLady	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14610

OMD, One correction, it was the ballot applications, not the ballots themselves which had the voter ID number problem. campaignwatch.org

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (502)	11/30/2000 10:12:36 AM
From: mph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14610

I read somewhere that the Democratic absentee ballot applications already contained the pre-printed #. I do not quite understand how it is different if the Republican applications are corrected by adding the number later. In either case, someone else filled in the number. These are only the applications for the absentee ballots, right? The count is based on the ballots returned. I seem to be missing something here. Do you think the suit has a chance of being successful?