Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Broadcom (BRCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bruce Brown who wrote (4801)	11/30/2000 9:44:23 AM
From: Lost1	Respond to of 6531

slonet.org YouMoron.com

To: Bruce Brown who wrote (4801)	11/30/2000 9:53:20 AM
From: Stoctrash	Respond to of 6531

Bruce, I have been right, face it. Fact, the stock has tanked and has nothing to do with what I have said but ENITRELY do to their problems, econ problems, and the election problem. Maybe the part about his tree was a little close to home, but I have no reason to believe a friend to lie to me about this story. Call my a liar on that since I can't prove this story, you'll have to ask his neighbors. You guys should be thanking me for my investigations, instead you are still snow blind. "It's just another chip company."

To: Bruce Brown who wrote (4801)	11/30/2000 10:51:04 AM
From: VINTHO	Respond to of 6531

How about freedom of expression??? How about counter Sue????

To: Bruce Brown who wrote (4801)	11/30/2000 11:20:17 AM
From: Stoctrash	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6531

Bruce, I turned rant mode off, just for you, since I like much of the work you have done on the GG thread. I may have a foul mouth, but I'm a funny and honest guy. Your threats cannot stop me from talking about the facts. Explain to me why Visiontech was worth $700M in this environment? I do realize that BRCM wanted a division in Israel, but I still don't "get" the price paid. VT does not have that much IPR that I am aware of? Am I wrong? Also, with the boat load of top notch engineers already on board, why do they need more UNLESS they gained some major IPR from the purchase? I'm all ears. ---------------- btw.....minor seller. BROADCOM AFFILIATE FILES FORM 144, TO SELL SHARES WASHINGTON, DC, Nov. 30, 2000 (States via COMTEX) -- William Ruehle, affiliate, Broadcom Corp. in Irvine, Calif., reported on Nov. 20, 2000, the proposed sale of 10,000 shares on Nov. 15, 2000, for $1,700,000 through Morgan Stanley & Co. News provided by