Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (95960)	11/30/2000 4:02:55 PM
From: willcousa	Respond to of 769670

No justice is going to embarass himself or herself by voting for Gore.

To: Bill who wrote (95960)	11/30/2000 4:04:43 PM
From: lawdog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Try 9-0 against petitioner.

To: Bill who wrote (95960)	11/30/2000 4:10:54 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

e-bill, Souter and Stevens for Gore for certain. The key vote as usual is Sandra Day O'Connor.

To: Bill who wrote (95960)	11/30/2000 4:14:01 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I think the U.S. Supreme Court rule either 9-0 or 6-3 in favor of Gore's filings. The precedent of this court is to let states make their own decisions, which is why I think it could be as blatant as 9-0. However, it's possible a hardliner contingent might wish to disent in order to write a minority opinion in the matter.