Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chomolungma who wrote (3116)	11/30/2000 4:11:53 PM
From: William Brotherson	Respond to of 3887

chomo, In your small sentence you sumed it all up with just the one word "interpretation"!! It's that simple. What does common sense say to you? With a dimple and two corners popped loose can there be any question or reasonable doubt that the voter "intended" for that vote to count? Is there "reasonable" doubt that the voter intended to vote for anyone if only a dimple is present? Common sense!! Also if the chad is popped loose but without any form of indentation, was it voted or just popped in handling? And I as well will retract me statement as 100% fact of law, It is only my common sense "Interpitation" of that law so there can be "Absolutely no doubt that the vote was intended for the person it was counted for" when I stated two corners must be detached! wb